Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Stakeholders' interests through their opinions on the alcohol policy measures in Slovenia
Authors:ID Radoš Krnel, Sandra (Author)
ID Kamin, Tanja (Author)
ID Košir, Matej (Author)
ID Markič, Mirko (Author)
Files:URL http://versita.metapress.com/content/g182875632178781/fulltext.pdf
 
Language:English
Work type:Not categorized
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:UPR - University of Primorska
Abstract:Namen dela: Z raziskavo smo želeli ugotoviti, kakšno mnenje o vplivu in pomembnosti posameznih ukrepov alkoholne politike pri zmanjševanju škodljivih posledic zaradi alkohola imajo različni akterji alkoholne politike v Sloveniji, in prepoznati njihove interese. Osnovne metode: Izvedli smo kvantitativno raziskavo, in sicer z vprašalnikom, ki je vseboval 25 trditev v okviru 9 področij alkoholne politike. Vprašalnik smo poslali 320 akterjem alkoholne politike v Sloveniji, razdeljenim v 4 glavne skupine: vladne organizacije, javnozdravstvene organizacije, nevladne organizacije ter alkoholna industrija. Zbrane podatke smo obdelali s programom SPSS. Razlike v pogledih na posamezno področje alkoholne politike med različnimi akterji smo ugotavljali s testom ANOVA in t-testom. Glavni izsledki: Faktorska analiza mnenj posameznih akterjev alkoholne politike v Sloveniji je razkrila tri glavne dejavnike: izobraževanje in ozaveščanje, regulacijske ukrepe in cenovneukrepe. Vsi akterji so kot najpomembnejše ukrepe in ukrepe z največjim učinkom izpostavili ukrepe, povezane z izobraževanjem, komuniciranjem in ozaveščanjem. Ukrepe s področja regulative alkoholna industrija zaznava kot občutno manj pomembne in z manjšim vplivom na zmanjševanje škodljivih posledic alkohola kot ostali akterji. Enako je z oceno ukrepov s področja cenovne politike. Poglavitni sklepi: Tako kot podobna raziskava o razumevanju alkoholne politike na evropski ravni tudi z našo ugotavljamo, da posamezne akterje alkoholne politike vodijo različni interesi v povezavi s posameznimi ukrepi alkoholne politike, vendar pa v Sloveniji te razlike niso tako izrazite kot na evropski ravni.Čeprav imajo akterji različne poglede in interese glede alkoholne politike in njenih posameznih ukrepov, smo z raziskavo prepoznali tista področja, na katerih lahko akterji sodelujejo pri pripravi boljših in učinkovitejših ukrepov alkoholne politike za preventivo škodljivih učinkov alkohola v Sloveniji.
Keywords:interests, alcohol policy, stakeholders, alcohol policy measures
Publisher:Inštitut za varovanje zdravja Republike Slovenije
Year of publishing:2010
Number of pages:str. 86-98
Numbering:Letn. 49, št. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-4773 This link opens in a new window
ISSN:0351-0026
UDC:613.8(497.4)
DOI:10.2478/v10152-010-0009-6 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:1024258900 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:10.07.2015
Views:2716
Downloads:137
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Interesi akterjev alkoholne politike skozi njihovo mnenje o ukrepih alkoholne politike v Sloveniji
Abstract:Aims: The purpose of the study was to determine how the stakeholders involved in alcohol policy in Slovenia view the importance and impact of alcohol policymeasures in alcohol-related harm reduction, and to identify their interests. Methods: The questionnaire comprising 25 statements across nine alcohol policy domains was sent to 320 stakeholders involved in alcohol policyin Slovenia. They were divided into the following four main groups: governmental organisations, public health organisations, non-governmental organisations and alcohol industry. The data collected were analysed using the SPSS programme. Differences between the groups concerning their views on individual alcohol policy interventions were measured using the ANOVA and T-test. Results: Factor analysis of stakeholders' views identified three main alcohol policy platforms: education, regulation and pricing. All the participating stakeholders emphasized education, communication, training and raising public awareness as the most important activities that had the greatest impact on the reduction of alcohol-related harm. Governmental and non-governmental organisations and public health institutions assigned significantly higher scores to the impact of regulatory alcohol policy measures and to the importance of regulatory policies on reducing alcohol-related harm than the alcohol industry. The alcohol industry perceived the pricing measures taken to reduce harm done by alcohol as having a significantly lower impact and lesser importance than did the group of otherstakeholders. Conclusions: Like similar studies of attitudes towards alcohol policy in Europe, our research showed that different stakeholders are guided by different interests in relation to particular alcohol policy measures; however, these differences were lesser than those identified at the EU level. In spite of stakeholders' different interests and views concerning particular alcohol strategies and alcohol policy in general, we have identified common grounds for them to work together to prepare better and more effective measures of alcohol-related harm prevention in Slovenia.
Keywords:interesi, alkoholna politika, akterji, ukrepi alkoholne politike


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica