<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=1000"><dc:title>Identities with generalized skew derivations on Lie ideals</dc:title><dc:creator>De Filippis,	Vincenzo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fošner,	Ajda	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wei,	Feng	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>mathematics</dc:subject><dc:subject>algebra</dc:subject><dc:subject>polynomial identity</dc:subject><dc:subject>generalized skew derivation</dc:subject><dc:subject>prime ring</dc:subject><dc:description>Let ▫$m, n$▫ be two nonzero fixed positive integers, ▫$R$▫ a 2-torsion free prime ring with the right Martindale quotient ring ▫$Q$▫, ▫$L$▫ a non-central Lie ideal of ▫$R$▫, and ▫$\delta$▫ a derivation of ▫$R$▫. Suppose that ▫$\alpha$▫ is an automorphism of ▫$R$▫, ▫$D$▫ a skew derivation of ▫$R$▫ with the associated automorphism ▫$\alpha$▫, and ▫$F$▫ a generalized skew derivation of ▫$R$▫ with the associated skew derivation ▫$D$▫. If ▫$$F(x^{m+n}) = F(x^m)x^n + x^m \delta (x^n)$$▫ is a polynomial identity for ▫$L$▫, then either ▫$R$▫ satisfies the standard polynomial identity ▫$s_4(x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4)$▫ of degree 4, or ▫$F$▫ is a generalized derivation of ▫$R$▫ and ▫$\delta = D$▫. Furthermore, in the latter case one of the following statements holds: (1) ▫$D = \delta = 0$▫ and there exists ▫$a \in Q$▫ such that ▫$F(x) = ax$▫ for all ▫$x \in R$▫; (2) ▫$\alpha$▫ is the identical mapping of ▫$R$▫.</dc:description><dc:date>2013</dc:date><dc:date>2013-10-15 12:05:28</dc:date><dc:type>Delo ni kategorizirano</dc:type><dc:identifier>1000</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
