<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=1066"><dc:title>Machiavelli or Gandhi?</dc:title><dc:creator>Kersten,	Carool	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>non-violence</dc:subject><dc:subject>political philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject>Muslims</dc:subject><dc:subject>Chaiwat Satha-Anand</dc:subject><dc:subject>Thailand</dc:subject><dc:subject/><dc:description>This article examines the doctrine of non-violence formulated by the Thai political scientist Chaiwat Satha-Anand, based on a close reading of his thesis "The Non-Violent Prince". Chaiwat's theoretical considerations will be related to the work of the political philosopher Leo Strauss. To illustrate his case for a pragmatic ethics of non-violence, Chaiwat Satha-Anand's doctrine will also be contrasted with the Gandhian notion of non-violence through a comparison with the writings of the French Islamologist Louis Massignon on the subject. Apart from this contrast, Massignon's concern with non-violent solutions for conflicts in the Muslim world forms an interesting parallel to Chaiwat Satha-Anand's engagement with similar issues affecting Thailand's Muslims</dc:description><dc:date>2009</dc:date><dc:date>2013-10-15 12:05:32</dc:date><dc:type>Delo ni kategorizirano</dc:type><dc:identifier>1066</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>