<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=22071"><dc:title>Groups with elements of order 8 do not have the DCI property</dc:title><dc:creator>Dobson,	Ted	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Morris,	Joy	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Spiga,	Pablo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>CI property</dc:subject><dc:subject>DCI property</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cayley graphs</dc:subject><dc:subject>Cayley digraphs</dc:subject><dc:subject>2-closed groups</dc:subject><dc:subject>2-closure</dc:subject><dc:description>Let k be odd, and n an odd multiple of 3. Although this can also be deduced from known results, we provide a new proof that Ck ⋊ C₈ and (Cn × C₃) ⋊ C₈ do not have the Directed Cayley Isomorphism (DCI) property. When k is prime, Ck ⋊ C₈ had previously been proved to have the Cayley Isomorphism (CI) property. To the best of our knowledge, the groups Cp ⋊ C₈ (where p is an odd prime) are only the second known infinite family of groups that have the CI property but do not have the DCI property. This also provides a new proof of the result (which follows from known results but was not explicitly published) that no group with an element of order 8 has the DCI property.
One piece of our proof is a new result that may prove to be of independent interest: we show that if a permutation group has a regular subgroup of index 2 then it must be 2-closed.</dc:description><dc:publisher>Založba Univerze na Primorskem</dc:publisher><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-11-03 11:57:40</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>22071</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
