<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=23557"><dc:title>Dark events in (post-)conflict social settings</dc:title><dc:creator>Šuligoj,	Metod	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>dark event</dc:subject><dc:subject>dark tourism</dc:subject><dc:subject>(post-)conflict setting</dc:subject><dc:subject>data gathering</dc:subject><dc:subject>methodology</dc:subject><dc:description>The paper emphasises the importance of ethical sensitivity, methodological adaptability, and reflexivity when studying dark events and deviant behaviour within socially complex settings. Focusing on dark events – organised controversial gatherings centered on past death and suffering – this paper addresses a growing yet under-researched area at the intersection of dark tourism, dark leisure, and collective memory studies. The characteristic deviant behaviours of organisers, performers, and/or attendees, combined with tense (post-)conflict social circumstances, complicate data gathering and elevate risks for both participants and researchers. Under such conditions, rigid randomised sampling is often unfeasible; instead, alternative strategies are necessary, requiring responsible and transparent implementation. In addition to field surveys, valuable – albeit often biased – data on deviance and dark events can be found online for (post-)conflict studies. These sources must be examined and interpreted critically, especially with regard to the limitations in knowledge creation processes.</dc:description><dc:date>2026</dc:date><dc:date>2026-09-01 10:48:46</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>23557</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
