<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.upr.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=2624"><dc:title>A note on domination and independence-domination numbers of graphs</dc:title><dc:creator>Milanič,	Martin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Vizing's conjecture</dc:subject><dc:subject>domination number</dc:subject><dc:subject>independence-domination number</dc:subject><dc:subject>weakly chordal graph</dc:subject><dc:subject>NP-completeness</dc:subject><dc:subject>hereditary graph class</dc:subject><dc:subject>IDD-perfect graph</dc:subject><dc:description>Vizing's conjecture is true for graphs ▫$G$▫ satisfying ▫$\gamma^i(G) = \gamma(G)$▫, where ▫$\gamma(G)$▫ is the domination number of a graph ▫$G$▫ and ▫$\gamma^i(G)$▫ is the independence-domination number of ▫$G$▫, that is, the maximum, over all independent sets ▫$I$▫ in ▫$G$▫, of the minimum number of vertices needed to dominate ▫$I$▫. The equality ▫$\gamma^i(G) = \gamma(G)$▫ is known to hold for all chordal graphs and for chordless cycles of length ▫$0 \pmod{3}$▫. We prove some results related to graphs for which the above equality holds. More specifically, we show that the problems of determining whether ▫$\gamma^i(G) = \gamma(G) = 2$▫ and of verifying whether ▫$\gamma^i(G) \ge 2$▫ are NP-complete, even if ▫$G$▫ is weakly chordal. We also initiate the study of the equality ▫$\gamma^i = \gamma$▫ in the context of hereditary graph classes and exhibit two infinite families of graphs for which ▫$\gamma^i &lt; \gamma$▫.</dc:description><dc:date>2013</dc:date><dc:date>2013-10-15 12:07:27</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>2624</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
