71. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and its implications for maternity care quality : a cross-sectional studyMirko Prosen, Sabina Ličen, 2025, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: Aim Satisfaction with childbirth is a key indicator of the quality of maternity care and influences maternal well-being and future reproductive choices. The aim of this study was to assess maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience and examine factors contributing to positive and negative perceptions. Subject and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 555 postpartum women in Slovenia. The study used an online survey to explore women's satisfaction with their childbirth experience within one year after giving birth. The Women’s Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ) was culturally adapted and validated for use in the Slovenian context. Data were analysed using descriptive and comparative non-parametric statistical methods to examine satisfaction levels and differences across demographic and obstetric variables. Results Overall, women reported a high level of satisfaction with their childbirth experience (M=4.00, IQR=1, p<0.001). The highest rated domain was timely contact with the newborn (M=4.67, IQR=1, p<0.001), while the birth environment and childbirth preparation were rated lowest (M=3.25, IQR=1, p<0.001). Satisfaction varied significantly according to parity, birth mode, pain management and partner presence during childbirth. Vaginal births and planned caesarean sections were associated with higher satisfaction compared to emergency caesarean sections. Conclusion Maternal satisfaction depends on support from healthcare professionals, birth expectations and the physical environment. Respectful care, shared decision-making and optimising the birth environment can improve the childbirth experience
Ključne besede: maternity care, postpartum women, birth expectations, healthcare professionals, obstetrics, midwifery
Objavljeno v RUP: 05.09.2025; Ogledov: 399; Prenosov: 5
 Celotno besedilo (842,25 KB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
72. Outcomes of digital nursing schedules : a systematic literature reviewAnton Grmšek Svetlin, Melita Peršolja, 2025, pregledni znanstveni članek Opis: The purpose of this literature review was to identify the evidence on the outcomes of digitalisation of schedules in nursing. Data were gathered from CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, ScienceDirect, JSTOR and SpringerLink electronic databases. Seventy-four relevant literature items were identified. Ten studies published between 2015 and 2024 were evaluated and critically analysed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist: four systematic literature reviews, three quasi-experimental studies, two case studies, and one qualitative descriptive study. The literature on electronic schedules in nursing reports on a variety of positive and negative impacts on nurses, patients and healthcare organisations. The introduction of electronic schedules in nursing is has mainly positive consequences, because if appropriately implemented, it leads to better patient health outcomes and increased job satisfaction among nurses. However, the developments in the field are ongoing and more research on that topic is needed before a firmer conclusion can be reached.
Ključne besede: digitalisation, nursing, roster, staffing and scheduling
Objavljeno v RUP: 24.08.2025; Ogledov: 448; Prenosov: 7
Celotno besedilo (375,49 KB) |
73. Reliability of postural sway measures during single-leg stance : a analysis using conventional and complementary error metricsŽiga Kozinc, Aurora Kuliqi, Iza Obal, 2025, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: This study examined the test–retest reliability of postural sway measures during single-leg stance in healthy adults. Forty-eight participants performed three 30-s barefoot trials across two sessions separated by 3–5 days, using a force platform to derive eight center of pressure (CoP) variables. Reliability was assessed using conventional reliability metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error (TE), coefficient of variation (CV), and minimal detectable change (MDC)), as well as recently suggested complementary indices (mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE)). Most CoP-derived variables showed good relative reliability, with ICCs ranging from 0.71 to 0.86. Sway velocity and frequency-based measures were the most consistent (e.g., sway velocity AP: ICC = 0.85), while sway area showed higher variability (ICC = 0.71, MAPE = 20.1%). Systematic improvements were observed between sessions, particularly for sway velocity (all p < 0.001) and area (p = 0.002). Absolute error metrics such as MAE and MAPE provided additional insight into individual-level variability, often exceeding values indicated by CV. The findings support the use of single-leg CoP measures in research and clinical assessments but highlight the need for careful interpretation of reliability based on both relative and absolute indices.
Ključne besede: reliability, center of pressure, balance assessment, measurement error, force platform
Objavljeno v RUP: 23.08.2025; Ogledov: 653; Prenosov: 22
Celotno besedilo (645,00 KB)
Gradivo ima več datotek! Več... |
74. |
75. |
76. |
77. |
78. |
79. |
80. |
