Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:‘A Complete Negation of theWill to Live’ : A Phenomenological Evaluation of Schopenhauer’s Quietism
Authors:ID Gershteyn, Vadim (Author)
Files:.pdf ZUP_Gershteyn_Vadim_2025.pdf (127,07 KB)
MD5: B1B00283B00C8410C81873C5BD6E1C79
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZUP - University of Primorska Press
Abstract:The author examines Arthur Schopenhauer’s concept of quietism: a philosophical stance that advocates detachment and negation of the will-to-live, as outlined in Schopenhauer’s The World as Will and Representation (1969). Schopenhauer, influenced by a Vedic philosophy that emphasizes ontological pessimism, perceives life as marked by suffering due to the will’s ceaseless striving. His ethical response to suffering, quietism, advocates withdrawal and stillness to transcend suffering. Employing a phenomenological approach, this author evaluates quietism in light of contemporary trauma research and psychological evidence, alongside Friedrich Nietzsche’s critique of Schopenhauer. Findings from mindfulness and exposure therapy studies suggest that complete withdrawal is unsustainable and detrimental to psychological well-being, which is contrasted with Schopenhauer’s radical negation of the will. Nietzsche’s philosophy of the will to power, though born from Schopenhauer’s Vedic-inspired ontology, emphasizes engagement with one’s suffering-filled life and transformation through it, thereby presenting a more dynamic, life-affirming alternative to Schopenhauer’s pessimistic withdrawal. The author concludes that while Schopenhauer’s insights into suffering are profound, his quietism is incomplete, thereby necessitating integration with active engagement and ethical responsibility to address human challenges effectively.
Keywords:Schopenhauer, quietism, phenomenology, will-to-live, Nietzsche, will to power, trauma, suffering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 161-173
Numbering:Vol. 57, no. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-22518 This link opens in a new window
ISSN:0587-5161
eISSN:2630-4082
DOI:https://doi.org/10.26493/2630-4082.57.161-173 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:22.01.2026
Views:211
Downloads:3
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Anthropos: revija za filozofijo in psihologijo
Publisher:Slovensko filozofsko društvo in Društvo psihologov Slovenije
ISSN:2630-4082
COBISS.SI-ID:295694336 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:»Popolna negacija volje do življenja« : fenomenološka ocena Schopnhauerjevega kvietizma
Abstract:Avtor preučuje Schopenhauerjev koncept kvietizma: filozofsko stališče, ki zagovarja odmaknjenost in zanikanje volje do življenja, kot je opisano v Schopenhauerjevem delu Svet kot volja in predstava (2008). Schopenhauer, na katerega je vplivala vedska filozofija, ki poudarja ontološki pesimizem, življenje dojema kot zaznamovano s trpljenjem zaradi nenehnega prizadevanja volje. Njegov etični odziv na trpljenje, kvietizem, zagovarja umik in mirnost za preseganje trpljenja. Avtor s fenomenološkim pristopom ocenjuje kvietizem v luči sodobnih raziskav travme in psiholoških dokazov ter Nietzschejevo kritiko Schopenhauerja. Ugotovitve študij čuječnosti in terapije izpostavljenosti kažejo, da je popoln umik nevzdržen in škodljiv za psihično dobro počutje, kar je v nasprotju s Schopenhauerjevim radikalnim zanikanjem volje. Nietzschejeva filozofija volje do moči, čeprav izhaja iz Schopenhauerjeve vedsko navdihnjene ontologije, poudarja vključevanje v lastno življenje, polno trpljenja, in preobrazbo skozi to, s čimer predstavlja dinamičnejšo, življenjsko potrjujočo alternativo Schopenhauerjevemu pesimističnemu umiku. Avtor zaključuje, da so Schopenhauerjevi vpogledi v trpljenje sicer globoki, vendar je njegov kvietizem nepopoln, zato je za učinkovito reševanje človeških izzivov potrebna integracija aktivnega vključevanja in etične odgovornosti.
Keywords:Schopenhauer, kvietizem, fenomenologija, volja do življenja, Nietzsche, volja do moči, travma, trpljenje


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica