| Title: | Musical Interpretation: Specifics of Working with Textual Statements and Other Aspects |
|---|
| Authors: | ID Velek, Viktor (Author) |
|---|
| Files: |  ZUP_Velek_Viktor_2025.pdf (3,77 MB)
MD5: D3E78BEDEF65564D16ABAFD00CB0E5B8
|
|---|
| Language: | English |
|---|
| Work type: | Not categorized |
|---|
| Typology: | 1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph |
|---|
| Organization: | ZUP - University of Primorska Press
|
|---|
| Abstract: | This article explores the issue of musical interpretation through a range of examples. The interdisciplinary approach spans ethnomusicology, opera interpretation and source authenticity, with all the examples firmly rooted in Czech musical culture. The first section revisits the earliest recordings of the songs of the Lusatian Serbs (1907) and addresses the correct approach when working with amateur musicians. In contrast, the second section focuses on historical recordings of operatic performances and subsequent reviews of live presentations. The example chosen here is the world-renowned Czech opera tenor Richard Kubla (1890–1964) and his problematic relationship with the music critic Milan Balcar. Their personal history complicated an objective assessment of Kubla’s performances. This section also covers another Czech opera star who achieved outstanding interpretive results both at home and abroad in the first half of the 20th century. Eva Hadrabová-Nedbalová, during her time in Vienna, suffered from various vocal indispositions, which affected her performances. The study uses handwritten notes from a frequent visitor to the Vienna State Opera to demonstrate the unreliability of certain reviews. During the Second World War, the soprano performed at the Nuremberg Opera, but her desire to leave led her to intentionally sing off-key – a fact that critics, of course, were unaware of, so they inadvertently judged her as past her prime and incompetent, evaluating a “simulation” rather than the real situation. For readers unfamiliar with the full context, these reviews could seem like a credible source of information. The third section discusses the issue of selecting a musical source. Mediaeval song repertoires often have various versions recorded, raising questions such as which one is the oldest or closest to the original. In the case of one of the most important Bohemian mediaeval musical works, the Hussite war hymn Ktož jsú Boží bojovníci (Ye Who Are Warriors of God), the situation is even more complex. The song first became a musical symbol, as well as a musical quotation, in its later version, published in 1530, and this version was incorporated into the musical culture of the late 19th century by Bedřich Smetana, the founder of modern Czech national music. A dilemma arose with the discovery of an earlier version from around 1420 (in the Jistebnice Cantionale). The coexistence of both versions sparked debate over which version of the score is most suitable, particularly when used as a musical quotation. |
|---|
| Keywords: | music, interpretation, opera, Lusatia, music criticism |
|---|
| Publication status: | Published |
|---|
| Publication version: | Version of Record |
|---|
| Publisher: | Založbe Univerze na Primorskem |
|---|
| Year of publishing: | 2025 |
|---|
| Number of pages: | str. 83-96 |
|---|
| PID: | 20.500.12556/RUP-22267  |
|---|
| ISBN: | 9789612934255 |
|---|
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.26493/978-961-293-425-5.83-96 |
|---|
| Publication date in RUP: | 18.12.2025 |
|---|
| Views: | 193 |
|---|
| Downloads: | 2 |
|---|
| Metadata: |    |
|---|
|
:
|
Copy citation |
|---|
| | | | Average score: | (0 votes) |
|---|
| Your score: | Voting is allowed only for logged in users. |
|---|
| Share: |  |
|---|
Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click
on the title to get all document metadata. |
