Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Within-session reliability and comparison in resisted sprint performance with the 1080 Sprint between belt and harness attachment points
Authors:ID Sašek, Matic (Author)
ID Volk, Nicola Reiner (Author)
ID Šarabon, Nejc (Author)
Files:URL https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.31.3.170-181
 
URL https://journals.uni-lj.si/kinsi/article/view/24192
 
.pdf RAZ_Sasek_Matic_2025.pdf (667,92 KB)
MD5: 9AC80D84E318BE416EEBBA21E306FD26
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FVZ - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:The application of resistance over the shoulder or hips during resisted sprints could influence performance outcomes but has not been thoroughly investigated. This study examined the within-session reliability of sprint performance measures and compared the outcomes of 1080 Sprint device between belt (hips) and harness (shoulders) attachment. Twelve student-athletes completed three 20 m sprints with resistance equivalent to 25% of body mass (14.0 to 24.7 kg). Sprint split times (5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m), peak velocity, and distance at peak velocity were recorded with 1080 Sprint. Within-session reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3.1) and coefficients of variation (CV), while differences in performance were analysed using paired t-tests and effect sizes (ES). Reliability was excellent for all variables (ICC3.1≥ 0.93; CV ≤ 3.08 %) except distance at peak velocity, which showed poor reliability (ICC3.1≥ 0.32; CV ≥ 17.2 %). Sprint times and peak velocity were faster with the belt attachment (ES ≥ 0.93), while peak velocity was reached earlier with the harness attachment (ES = 0.65). Both attachment points provided reliable measurements, but the belt consistently resulted in faster 20 m sprint performance. Coaches and practitioners should consider these differences when assessing resisted sprint performance or prescribing training to ensure consistent and individualized loading strategies
Keywords:resisted sprint, resistance, sprint performance, speed assessment
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:21.12.2025
Year of publishing:2025
Number of pages:str. 170-181
Numbering:Vol. 31, no. 3
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-22358 This link opens in a new window
UDC:796.01
ISSN on article:1318-2269
DOI:10.52165/kinsi.31.3.170-181 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:263232771 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:30.12.2025
Views:43
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Kinesiologia Slovenica : scientific journal on sport
Shortened title:Kinesiol. Slov.
Publisher:Fakulteta za šport, Inštitut za kineziologijo
ISSN:1318-2269
COBISS.SI-ID:30681856 This link opens in a new window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P5-0443-2022
Name:Kineziologija za učinkovitost in preventivo mišično-skeletnih poškodb v športu

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Znotrajobiskovna ponovljivost in primerjava v zmogljivosti med izvedbo sprinta proti uporu z napravo 1080 sprint med izvedbo s pasom in oprtjo
Abstract:Namestitevenakega upora preko ramen ali bokov med sprinti proti uporu lahko vpliva na zmogljivost. Namen te študije je bil preučiti ponovljivost meritev zmogljivosti sprinta znotraj obiska in primerjati hitrost sprinta proti uporu spritrditvijo prekopasu(na bokih) inpreko oprti(na ramenih).Dvanajst študentov-športnikov je izvedlo tri sprinte proti uporu25 % telesne mase (14,0 do 24,7 kg)na razdalji20 m.Vmesni časi sprinta(na 5 m, 10 m, 15 m, 20 m), največja hitrost ter razdalja pri največji hitrosti so bili izmerjeniz napravo 1080 Sprint. Znotrajobiskovnazanesljivost je bila ocenjena z intraklasnim koeficientomkorelacije (ICC3.1) in koeficientom variance(CV), medtem ko so bile razlike v izvedbi analizirane s t-testi za odvisne vzorce. Ponovljivostje bila odlična za vse spremenljivke (ICC3.1≥ 0.93; CV ≤ 3.08 %) razen za razdaljo pri največji hitrosti, ki je pokazala slabo ponovljivost(ICC3.1≥ 0.32; CV ≥ 17.2 %). Vmesni časi in največja hitrost so bili hitrejšispritrditvijoprekopasu(ES ≥ 0.93), medtem ko je bila največja hitrost dosežena prej spritrditvijopreko oprti(ES = 0.65). Obe pritrdišči sta zagotavljali zanesljive meritve, vendar je pas dosledno omogočal hitrejšo izvedbo sprinta na 20 m. Trenerji in strokovnjaki naj te razlike upoštevajo pri vrednotenju zmogljivosti sprinta protiuporuali predpisovanjuvadbe, da zagotovijokonsistentne strategijeobremenjevanja
Keywords:sprinti proti uporu, upor, sprinterska zmogljivost, vrednotenje hitrosti


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica