Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Time-money segment differences in ideation and collaboration readiness in sustainable tourism education
Authors:ID Križaj, Dejan (Author)
Files:.pdf RAZ_Krizaj_Dejan_2026.pdf (470,73 KB)
MD5: E7E981A42FAAB1328F7D0CAF5F96EA5C
 
URL https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4490
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FTŠ Turistica - Turistica – College of Tourism Portorož
Abstract:This study examines whether tourism students’ self-reported time–money use patterns are related to their readiness to collaborate on idea development, and whether sustain- ability emerges spontaneously in their tourism innovation ideas. Using an anonymised dataset of open-ended questionnaire responses from Slovenian higher education tourism students (N = 597; 2019–2025), we applied deterministic rule-based coding to classify the presence of actionable ideas and sustainability framing, as well as collaboration readiness and conditions. Actionable ideas were common (53.4%), but sustainability framing was uncommon (7.5%). Most respondents were unconditionally willing to collaborate (69.3%), while 30.7% expressed conditional willingness or unwillingness. Time–money behavioural segments were significantly associated with collaboration reservations, whereas segment differences in ideation and sustainability framing were not significant. Among students expressing reservations, topic match and perceived team quality were the most frequently stated conditions. These findings indicate that sustainability-oriented tourism education should support both sustainability integration and low-risk collaboration through clear project briefs, topic-based matching, and team-process supports. The conclusions should be interpreted with reasonable caution as they are context-specific evidence based on self- reported, rule-coded responses, particularly for sustainability framing, where positive cases were rare. In this context, segmentation should be regarded as a diagnostic tool for course design rather than as a basis for labelling students.
Keywords:tourism education, sustainability, collaboration readiness, behavioural segmentation, time–money trade-offs, project-based learning, open-ended survey, clustering
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:02.05.2026
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 1-20
Numbering:Vol. 18, iss. 9, [article no.] 4490
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-23000 This link opens in a new window
UDC:338.48
ISSN on article:2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su18094490 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:276858627 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:04.05.2026
Views:30
Downloads:2
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Sustainability
Shortened title:Sustainability
Publisher:MDPI
ISSN:2071-1050
COBISS.SI-ID:5324897 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Abstract:Ta študija preučuje, ali so vzorci porabe časa in denarja, ki jih navajajo študenti turizma, povezani z njihovo pripravljenostjo na sodelovanje pri razvoju idej ter ali se trajnost spontano pojavlja v njihovih idejah za inovacije v turizmu. Z uporabo anonimiziranega niza podatkov odprtih odgovorov na vprašalnik, ki so jih podali slovenski študenti turizma na visokošolski ustanovi (N = 597; 2019–2025) smo uporabili deterministično kodiranje na podlagi pravil za razvrstitev prisotnosti izvedljivih idej in trajnostne umestitve ter pripravljenosti in pogojev za sodelovanje. Izvedljive ideje so bile pogoste (53,4 %), trajnostna umestitev pa je bila redka (7,5 %). Večina anketirancev je bila brezpogojno pripravljena na sodelovanje (69,3 %), medtem ko je 30,7 % izrazilo pogojno pripravljenost ali nepripravljenost. Segmenti vedenja, povezani s časom in denarjem, so bili pomembno povezani z zadržki glede sodelovanja, medtem ko razlike med segmenti pri ustvarjanju idej in trajnostni umestitvi niso bile pomembne. Med študenti, ki so izrazili zadržke, sta bila najpogosteje navedena pogoja ujemanje tem in zaznana kakovost ekipe. Ti rezultati kažejo, da bi moralo izobraževanje na področju turizma, usmerjeno v trajnost, podpirati tako vključevanje trajnosti kot tudi sodelovanje z nizkim tveganjem prek jasnih projektnih navodil, ujemanja na podlagi tem in podpore procesom v ekipi. Zaključke je treba razlagati z ustrezno previdnostjo, saj gre za dokaze, vezane na posamezen kontekst, ki temeljijo na samoporočanju in kodiranih odgovorih, zlasti kar zadeva trajnostno umestitev, kjer so bili pozitivni primeri redki. V tem kontekstu je treba segmentacijo obravnavati kot diagnostično orodje za oblikovanje študijskih programov in ne kot podlago za označevanje študentov.
Keywords:izobraževanje na področju turizma, trajnost, pripravljenost na sodelovanje, segmentacija na podlagi vedenja, kompromisi med časom in denarjem, projektno učenje, odprta anketa, združevanje v skupine


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica