Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Entangled futures : utopianism, white supremacy, and radical futurity
Authors:ID Pristovšek, Jovita (Author)
Files:.pdf ZUP_Pristovsek_Jovita_2026.pdf (174,70 KB)
MD5: 892F757829BBB1437B3F885A1F959540
 
URL https://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/2630-4082/58.137-161.pdf
 
Language:English
Work type:Unknown
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZUP - University of Primorska Press
Abstract:This article examines utopianism as a historically contingent and politically ambivalent discourse shaped by its entanglement with race, Indigeneity, empire, and white supremacy. Challenging neutral or universalist accounts of utopia, it argues that modern utopian thought emerged not outside colonial modernity but through and alongside its architectures of territorial conquest, epistemic hierarchization, racial differentiation, coerced labour, and imperial governance. In its canonical form, utopia functioned as a technology of colonial futurity: it rendered land available for appropriation and extraction, positioned Europe as the agent of historical progress, and naturalized racialized forms of dispossession in the name of an ideal social order. Yet the article does not conclude that futurity itself must be abandoned. In stead, it provincializes classical utopia and asks what remains of world imagination after utopia’s colonial genealogy has been exposed. To address this, the article develops the concept of ‘entangled futures’: a con flictual field in which colonial, decolonial, Black radical, Indigenous, and anti-humanist temporalities are historically forced into relation without becoming equivalent or fully translatable. Through readings in utopian studies, settler-colonial critique, Black radical thought, critiques of Western humanism, and Indigenous futurisms, it argues that radical futurity cannot be reduced to a single emancipatory horizon. What survives the critique of utopia is not its rehabilitation as a universal ideal, but a fractured and incommensurable field of world-making.
Keywords:utopia, colonial futurity, settler colonialism, entangled futures, radical futurity
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Koper
Publisher:Založba Univerze na Primorskem
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:Str. 137-161
Numbering:Letn. 58, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-23529 This link opens in a new window
UDC:167.5
ISSN on article:0587-5161
DOI:10.26493/2630-4082.58.137-161 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:288181763 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:21.08.2026
Views:46
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Anthropos : časopis za psihologijo in filozofijo ter za sodelovanje humanističnih ved
Shortened title:Anthropos
Publisher:Društvo psihologov Slovenije, Slovensko filozofsko društvo, Društvo psihologov Slovenije, Slovensko filozofsko društvo, Založba Univerze na Primorskem
ISSN:0587-5161
COBISS.SI-ID:736516 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Prepletene prihodnosti : utopizem, bela prevlada in radikalna prihodnost
Abstract:Prispevek obravnava utopizem kot zgodovinsko kontingenten in politično ambivalenten diskurz, ki ga določa njegova prepletenost z raso, s staroselskostjo, z imperijem in belo nadvlado. V nasprotju z nevtralnimi oz. univerzalističnimi obravnavami utopije zagovarja tezo, da se moderna utopična misel ni oblikovala zunaj kolonialne modernosti, temveč skozi in skupaj z njenimi arhitekturami teritorialne prilastitve, epistemske hierarhizacije, rasnega diferenciranja, prisilnega dela in imperialnega vladanja. V svoji kanonični obliki je utopija delovala kot tehnologija kolonialne prihodnosti: zemljo je vzpostavila kot razpoložljivo za prisvajanje, Evropo kot subjekt zgodovinskega napredka ter v imenu idealnega družbenega reda naturalizirala rasizirane oblike razlaščanja. Prispevek zato ne sklepa, da je treba opustiti prihodnost kot tako, temveč provincializira klasično utopijo in se sprašuje, kaj ostane od svetotvorne zmožnosti imaginacije po razkritju njene kolonialne genealogije. V ta namen razvije koncept »prepletenih prihodnosti«, konfliktnega polja, v katerem so kolonialne, dekolonialne, črnske radikalne, staroselske in antihumanistične temporalnosti zgodovinsko prisiljene v medsebojni odnos, ne da bi postale ekvivalentne, harmonične ali povsem prevedljive. Ob branjih s področij utopičnih študij, kritike naseljenskega kolonializma, črnske radikalne misli, kritik zahodnega humanizma in staroselskih futurizmov zagovarja, da radikalne prihodnosti ni mogoče zvesti na en sam emancipatorni horizont. Po kritiki utopije tako ne ostane njen univerzalni ideal, temveč razklano in neizmerljivo polje svetotvorja.
Keywords:utopija, kolonialna prihodnost, naseljenski kolonializem, prepletene prihodnosti, radikalna prihodnost


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica