Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Experiences and perceptions of patients participating in prehabilitation and early rehabilitation for hip and knee arthroplasty : a systematic review and narrative synthesis of qualitative evidence
Authors:ID Opara, Manca Zupančič (Author)
ID Kozinc, Žiga (Author)
ID Loefler, Stefan (Author)
ID Miedler, Karl (Author)
ID Šarabon, Nejc (Author)
Files:URL https://www.dovepress.com/experiences-and-perceptions-of-patients-participating-in-prehabilitati-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PPA
 
URL https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S627109
 
.pdf RAZ_Opara_Manca_Zupancic_2026.pdf (2,51 MB)
MD5: 126C5F3D3A7BCD41446F761D5382F327
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.02 - Review Article
Organization:FVZ - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:Objective: To synthesize qualitative evidence on patients’ experiences and perceptions of prehabilitation and early rehabilitation in the context of hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods: A systematic review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with the databases searched from inception to March 2026. Eligible studies included individuals referred for or undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty and reporting qualitative data on experiences with prehabilitation or early rehabilitation. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened by one reviewer and independently checked by a second reviewer, while data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist. Findings were synthesized using a primarily descriptive narrative approach with thematic organization into facilitators and barriers; a formal qualitative meta-synthesis was not conducted. The review protocol was not registered. Results: Twelve studies were included: 11 focused on prehabilitation and two on early postoperative rehabilitation. The included studies involved patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, or both procedures. Patient experiences were grouped into five thematic domains: symptoms and physical condition, understanding and information, behavior, psychological well-being, and intervention delivery. Reported facilitators included improved symptoms and physical function, greater understanding and preparedness for surgery, better pain coping, improved psychological well-being, and positive experiences with different delivery formats. Reported barriers included increased pain, information overload, language barriers, limited individualization, restricted interaction, and varying delivery preferences. The evidence base was heterogeneous in terms of intervention content, delivery mode, patient populations, and depth of qualitative reporting. Conclusion: Prehabilitation and early rehabilitation were generally perceived positively, but several barriers were identified. The findings highlight the importance of symptom monitoring, individualized exercise prescription, clear tailored education, and flexible delivery formats. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because the synthesis was primarily descriptive, the included studies were heterogeneous, and the evidence was substantially stronger for prehabilitation than for early rehabilitation.
Keywords:prehabilitation, early rehabilitation, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, patient experience, qualitative research
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:25.08.2026
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 1-14
Numbering:Vol. 20, [article no.] 627109
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-23552 This link opens in a new window
UDC:617.3
ISSN on article:1177-889X
DOI:10.2147/PPA.S627109 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:289378819 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:30.08.2026
Views:39
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Patient preference and adherence
Shortened title:Patient prefer. adherence
Publisher:Dove Medical Press
ISSN:1177-889X
COBISS.SI-ID:519176729 This link opens in a new window

Document is financed by a project

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P5-0443
Name:Kineziologija za učinkovitost in preventivo mišično-skeletnih poškodb v športu

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Izkušnje in zaznave pacientov, vključenih v prehabilitacijo in zgodnjo rehabilitacijo po artroplastiki kolka in kolena: sistematični pregled in narativna sinteza kvalitativnih dokazov
Keywords:prehabilitacija, zgodnja rehabilitacija, artroplastika kolka, artroplastika kolena, izkušnje pacientov, kvalitativno raziskovanje


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica