11. Upravljanje tehnologije - ključ konkurenčnostiSlavko Dolinšek, Cene Bavec, Igor Prodan, Aleš Mihelič, 2002, pregledni znanstveni članek Opis: Meneđment (upravljanje ali tudi ravnanje) tehnologije je zahtevna in široka panoga, ki obsega izrazito interdisciplinarna znanja tehnologij in meneđmenta in daleč presega upravljanje tehnoloških procesov in meneđment inovacij. V svetu zaradi izjemnega tehnološkega razvoja postaja tako pomembna kakor je meneđment organizacije in njenih poslovnih funkcij. Kot študijski program, največkrat podiplomski, pa jo odkrijemo na kar nekaj tujih univerzah, medtem ko je v Sloveniji podoben program še na stopnji uvajanja. Izraza meneđment ali tehnologija se zato dandanes veliko uporablja, vendar največkrat v neustreznem pomenu, zato je namen prispevka prikazati vsebino panoge in tudi kratko pojasniti omenjena pojma. Ključne besede: menedžment tehnologij, menedžment, tehmnologije, izobraževanje Objavljeno v RUP: 03.04.2017; Ogledov: 3647; Prenosov: 34 Povezava na celotno besedilo |
12. |
13. |
14. |
15. Sajevce : železnodobno gomilno grobišče ob KrkiMitja Guštin, Andrej Preložnik, 2005, izvirni znanstveni članek Ključne besede: Sajevce, grobišča, gomile, starejša železna doba, grobni pridatki, pasne garniture, ornamentika, zlato, arheologija, Slovenija Objavljeno v RUP: 10.07.2015; Ogledov: 3316; Prenosov: 45 Povezava na celotno besedilo |
16. O zgodovinskih sporih in preobratih v teorijah javnega mnenjaSlavko Splichal, 2007, izvirni znanstveni članek Opis: This paper discusses the conceptual heterogeneity in the field of 'public opinion' in the light of a distinction between positions that reflect public opinion as a democratic-emancipatory category and positions that consider public opinion from an 'anthropological' perspective - as an semi-institutional resource of social control. The paper discusses the main characteristics and implications of these two different perspectives in conceptualizing public opinion, primarily the questions of the differences between publicly expressed opinions and public opinion, subject/ivity of public opinion (public opinions vs. opinion of the public), and the controversial relation of public opinion to democracy and surveillance. The argument is made that in the two centuries following Bentham's and Kant's codification of the principle of publicity, none of the fundamental controversies has been resolved. Although the belief that the establishment of a public opinion polling industry homogenized and stablized the definition of public opinion is widely accepted by pollsters, the facts rather prove the contrary: despite the enormous quantities of money and attention devoted to public opinion polling, there are few theoretical perspectives to guide research on the role of public opinion in the political process, which is primarily a consequence of the fact that consistent and operationally valid definitions of the concept 'public opinion' are still missing. There are no signs of 'reconciliation' between normative-theoretical and empirical-statistical perspectives; on the contrary, it seems that Wilson was right when 45 years ago he stated that the differences between those who 'believe in scientific study alone' and those who see in the study of public opinion a possibility of advancement of rational and humane goals can hardly disappear Ključne besede: javno mnenje, javnost, publiciteta, demokracija, nadzorovanje, mnenjske poizvedbe Objavljeno v RUP: 10.07.2015; Ogledov: 2254; Prenosov: 29 Povezava na celotno besedilo |
17. |
18. |
19. |
20. |