Lupa

Show document Help

A- | A+ | Print
Title:Reflective practice as part of the professional development of nursing students : a cross-sectional study
Authors:ID Ličen, Sabina (Author)
ID Ruzzier, Iris (Author)
ID Zdovc, Mitja (Author)
ID Milačak, Marko (Author)
ID Prosen, Mirko (Author)
Files:URL https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/globnursinsights/article/1914018
 
URL https://doi.org/10.31125/globnursinsights.1914018
 
.pdf RAZ_Licen_Sabina_2026.pdf (409,48 KB)
MD5: E04F25A98372A69A26DA7ECBC4B293B0
 
Language:English
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FVZ - Faculty of Health Sciences
Abstract:Aim: The aim of the study was to quantitatively assess reflective capacity among nursing students and to examine the expression of its dimensions in the clinical learning environment. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study design was used. A purposive sample of 177 nursing students enrolled in the Nursing programme in Slovenia participated in the study. Data were collected between October and December 2025 using the Reflective Practice Questionnaire. The study used the 16-item reflective capacity subscale, which includes four dimensions: reflection-in-action, reflection-on-action, reflection with others, and self-appraisal. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey (1KA). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 29. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Due to non-normal data distribution, non-parametric tests were applied, including the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Friedman test, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results: The results showed a relatively high level of reflective capacity among nursing students (Mdn = 4.56). Based on median values, the highest scores were observed in reflection with others and self-appraisal, while the lowest were found for reflection-in-action. Differences between reflective capacity dimensions were not statistically significant (χ²(3) = 2.399, p = 0.494). No significant differences were observed between full-time and part-time students or across years of study (p > 0.05). Age was not significantly associated with reflective capacity, except for a weak negative correlation with reflection with others (ρ = −0.193, p = 0.011). Students who perceived reflection as important for their professional development and those interested in additional practical training demonstrated significantly higher levels of reflective capacity (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The findings indicate that nursing students demonstrate a relatively high level of reflective capacity, particularly in collaborative reflective processes. Reflective practice appears to be an important component of clinical learning and professional development in nursing education. Implication for nursing practice: Structured reflective activities, mentoring conversations, and guided reflection in clinical environments may strengthen students’ clinical judgement, professional responsibility, and quality of patient care.
Keywords:clinical education, nursing education, nursing students, reflective capacity, reflective practice
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:24.08.2026
Year of publishing:2026
Number of pages:str. 251-260
Numbering:Vol. 13, iss. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUP-23544 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-083
ISSN on article:3108-3935
DOI:10.31125/globnursinsights.1914018 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:288719875 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUP:24.08.2026
Views:39
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
  
Average score:(0 votes)
Your score:Voting is allowed only for logged in users.
Share:Bookmark and Share


Hover the mouse pointer over a document title to show the abstract or click on the title to get all document metadata.

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Global nursing insights
Publisher:Hacettepe Üniversitesi
ISSN:3108-3935
COBISS.SI-ID:288719107 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:klinično izobraževanje, izobraževanje v zdravstveni negi, študenti zdravstvene nege, refleksivna sposobnost, refleksivna praksa


Comments

Leave comment

You must log in to leave a comment.

Comments (0)
0 - 0 / 0
 
There are no comments!

Back
Logos of partners University of Maribor University of Ljubljana University of Primorska University of Nova Gorica